University of Hertfordshire

Analytic Theology and the Phenomenology of Faith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review



  • Katherine Kirkpatrick
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-233
JournalJournal of Analytic Theology
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016


This article argues that analytic philosophy has a “convincingness deficit”; that proponents of the analytic method’s application to questions of theology must consider whether it is the best tool for the purpose at hand; and that phenomenology – in particular, Sartrean phenomenology – provides a useful methodological complement to the scholarly analysis of faith. After defining the convincingness deficit and what I take analytic theology to be, I defend phenomenology against the charge of “subjectivity” (voiced by Dennett and others) in order to argue that the varied ends of theological discourse require varied means – means which include phenomenology


This article has been accepted for publication in Journal of Analytic Theology, ©2016 Kate Kirkpatrick, Vol. 4, May 2016, the Version of Record is available online at doi: 10.12978/jat.2016-4.100004100810a © 2016 Journal of Analytic Theology, a joint publication of the Center for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Notre Dame and Baylor University.

ID: 10489048