University of Hertfordshire

Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Standard

Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation. / Kamudoni, Paul; Johns, Nutjaree; Salek, Mir-Saeed Shayegan.

Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes. Singapore : Adis, 2018. p. 115-140.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Harvard

Kamudoni, P, Johns, N & Salek, M-SS 2018, Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation. in Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes. Adis, Singapore, pp. 115-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8414-0_6

APA

Kamudoni, P., Johns, N., & Salek, M-S. S. (2018). Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation. In Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes (pp. 115-140). Adis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8414-0_6

Vancouver

Kamudoni P, Johns N, Salek M-SS. Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation. In Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes. Singapore: Adis. 2018. p. 115-140 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8414-0_6

Author

Kamudoni, Paul ; Johns, Nutjaree ; Salek, Mir-Saeed Shayegan. / Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation. Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes. Singapore : Adis, 2018. pp. 115-140

Bibtex

@inbook{650e407869784bdb8408acaf8a84b0ec,
title = "Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation",
abstract = "The validity of a PRO measure encompasses the evaluative judgement of the degree to which empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the trustworthiness of interpretations and actions based on scale scores (Messick 1988). Such score inferences might be specific to a particular context of use. Although a distinction is often made between content validity, criterion validity and construct validity, these are interdependent and generally reflect different forms of evidence supportive of the credibility, accuracy and dependability of a measure—embodying a holistic concept of construct validity (Streiner and Norman 2008).",
author = "Paul Kamudoni and Nutjaree Johns and Salek, {Mir-Saeed Shayegan}",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-10-8414-0_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-981-10-8413-3",
pages = "115--140",
booktitle = "Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes",
publisher = "Adis",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessing the Performance of PRO Measures Against Expectations: Psychometric Evaluation

AU - Kamudoni, Paul

AU - Johns, Nutjaree

AU - Salek, Mir-Saeed Shayegan

PY - 2018/9/7

Y1 - 2018/9/7

N2 - The validity of a PRO measure encompasses the evaluative judgement of the degree to which empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the trustworthiness of interpretations and actions based on scale scores (Messick 1988). Such score inferences might be specific to a particular context of use. Although a distinction is often made between content validity, criterion validity and construct validity, these are interdependent and generally reflect different forms of evidence supportive of the credibility, accuracy and dependability of a measure—embodying a holistic concept of construct validity (Streiner and Norman 2008).

AB - The validity of a PRO measure encompasses the evaluative judgement of the degree to which empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the trustworthiness of interpretations and actions based on scale scores (Messick 1988). Such score inferences might be specific to a particular context of use. Although a distinction is often made between content validity, criterion validity and construct validity, these are interdependent and generally reflect different forms of evidence supportive of the credibility, accuracy and dependability of a measure—embodying a holistic concept of construct validity (Streiner and Norman 2008).

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-10-8414-0_6

DO - 10.1007/978-981-10-8414-0_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-981-10-8413-3

SP - 115

EP - 140

BT - Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes

PB - Adis

CY - Singapore

ER -