University of Hertfordshire

Documents

  • Roma Maguire
  • Emma Ream
  • Alison Richardson
  • John Connaghan
  • Bridget Johnston
  • Grigorios Kotronoulas
  • Vibe Pedersen
  • John McPhelim
  • Natalie Pattison
  • Allison Smith
  • Lorraine Webster
  • Anne Taylor
  • Nora Kearney
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E37-47
JournalCancer nursing
Volume38
Issue2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 May 2014

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of technology-enhanced patient-reported outcome measures to monitor the symptoms experienced by people with cancer is an effective way to offer timely care.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (a) explore the feasibility and acceptability of the Advanced Symptom Management System with patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy and clinicians involved in their care and (b) assess changes in patient outcomes during implementation of the Advanced Symptom Management System with patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy in clinical practice.

METHODS: A repeated-measures, single-arm, mixed-methods study design was used involving poststudy interviews and completion of patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and end of treatment with 16 patients with lung cancer and 13 clinicians who used this mobile phone-based symptom monitoring system.

RESULTS: Only rarely did patients report problems in using the handset and they felt that the system covered all relevant symptoms and helped them to manage their symptoms and effectively communicate with clinicians. Clinical improvements in patient anxiety, drowsiness, and self-care self-efficacy were also observed. Clinicians perceived the use of "real-time" risk algorithms and automated self-care advice provided to patients as positively contributing to clinical care. Reducing the complexity of the system was seen as important to promote its utility.

CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, these results suggest that monitoring patient symptoms using mobile technology in the context of radiotherapy for lung cancer is feasible and acceptable in clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Future research would be most beneficial if the use of this technology was focused on the postradiotherapy phase and expanded the scope of the system to encompass a wider range of supportive care needs.

Notes

This document is an Accepted Manuscript version, reprinted from Cancer Nursing Vol. 38 (2): E37-47, May 2014, with permission of Wolters Kluwer. Content in the UH Research Archive is made available for personal research, educational, and non-commercial purposes only. Unless otherwise stated, all content is protected by copyright, and in the absence of an open license, permissions for further re-use should be sought from the publisher, the author, or other copyright holder.

ID: 12903627