University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

  • Christopher H. Dalton
  • Charlotte A. Hall
  • Helen L. Lydon
  • J. Kevin Chipman
  • John S. Graham
  • John Jenner
  • Robert Chilcott
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-550
JournalJournal of Applied Toxicology
Volume35
Issue5
Early online date12 Sep 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 May 2015

Abstract

The risk of penetrating, traumatic injury occurring in a chemically contaminated environment cannot be discounted. Should a traumatic injury be contaminated with a chemical warfare (CW) agent, it is likely that standard haemostatic treatment options would be complicated by the need to decontaminate the wound milieu. Thus, there is a need to develop haemostatic products that can simultaneously arrest haemorrhage and decontaminate CW agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a number of candidate haemostats for efficacy as skin decontaminants against three CW agents (soman, VX and sulphur mustard) using an in vitro diffusion cell containing undamaged pig skin. One haemostatic product (WoundStat™) was shown to be as effective as the standard military decontaminants Fuller's earth and M291 for the decontamination of all three CW agents. The most effective haemostatic agents were powder-based and use fluid absorption as a mechanism of action to sequester CW agent (akin to the decontaminant Fuller's earth). The envisaged use of haemostatic decontaminants would be to decontaminate from within wounds and from damaged skin. Therefore, WoundStat™ should be subject to further evaluation using an in vitro model of damaged skin. Copyright © 2014 Crown copyright. Journal of Applied Toxicology © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

ID: 7932712