University of Hertfordshire

Enactivism and Robotic Language Acquisition: A Report from the Frontier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{37fa408e7e0244819ee0f95e86346d1d,
title = "Enactivism and Robotic Language Acquisition: A Report from the Frontier",
abstract = "In this article, I assess an existing language acquisition architecture, which was deployed in linguistically unconstrained human–robot interaction, together with experimental design decisions with regard to their enactivist credentials. Despite initial scepticism with respect to enactivism{\textquoteright}s applicability to the social domain, the introduction of the notion of participatory sense-making in the more recent enactive literature extends the framework{\textquoteright}s reach to encompass this domain. With some exceptions, both our architecture and form of experimentation appear to be largely compatible with enactivist tenets. I analyse the architecture and design decisions along the five enactivist core themes of autonomy, embodiment, emergence, sense-making, and experience, and discuss the role of affect due to its central role within our acquisition experiments. In conclusion, I join some enactivists in demanding that interaction is taken seriously as an irreducible and independent subject of scientific investigation, and go further by hypothesising its potential value to machine learning.",
author = "Frank Foerster",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "7",
doi = "10.3390/philosophies4010011",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Philosophies: Special Issue on Frontiers of Embodied Artificial Intelligence: The (r-)evolution of the embodied approach in AI",
issn = "2409-9287",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enactivism and Robotic Language Acquisition: A Report from the Frontier

AU - Foerster, Frank

PY - 2019/3/7

Y1 - 2019/3/7

N2 - In this article, I assess an existing language acquisition architecture, which was deployed in linguistically unconstrained human–robot interaction, together with experimental design decisions with regard to their enactivist credentials. Despite initial scepticism with respect to enactivism’s applicability to the social domain, the introduction of the notion of participatory sense-making in the more recent enactive literature extends the framework’s reach to encompass this domain. With some exceptions, both our architecture and form of experimentation appear to be largely compatible with enactivist tenets. I analyse the architecture and design decisions along the five enactivist core themes of autonomy, embodiment, emergence, sense-making, and experience, and discuss the role of affect due to its central role within our acquisition experiments. In conclusion, I join some enactivists in demanding that interaction is taken seriously as an irreducible and independent subject of scientific investigation, and go further by hypothesising its potential value to machine learning.

AB - In this article, I assess an existing language acquisition architecture, which was deployed in linguistically unconstrained human–robot interaction, together with experimental design decisions with regard to their enactivist credentials. Despite initial scepticism with respect to enactivism’s applicability to the social domain, the introduction of the notion of participatory sense-making in the more recent enactive literature extends the framework’s reach to encompass this domain. With some exceptions, both our architecture and form of experimentation appear to be largely compatible with enactivist tenets. I analyse the architecture and design decisions along the five enactivist core themes of autonomy, embodiment, emergence, sense-making, and experience, and discuss the role of affect due to its central role within our acquisition experiments. In conclusion, I join some enactivists in demanding that interaction is taken seriously as an irreducible and independent subject of scientific investigation, and go further by hypothesising its potential value to machine learning.

U2 - 10.3390/philosophies4010011

DO - 10.3390/philosophies4010011

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Philosophies: Special Issue on Frontiers of Embodied Artificial Intelligence: The (r-)evolution of the embodied approach in AI

JF - Philosophies: Special Issue on Frontiers of Embodied Artificial Intelligence: The (r-)evolution of the embodied approach in AI

SN - 2409-9287

IS - 1

ER -