University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Evaluation criteria for construction waste management tools

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Evaluation criteria for construction waste management tools. / Akinade, Olugbenga O.; Oyedele, Lukumon O.; Munir, Kamran; Bilal, Muhammad; Ajayi, Saheed O.; Owolabi, Hakeem A.; Alaka, Hafiz A.; Bello, Sururah A.

In: International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, 23.03.2016, p. 3-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Akinade, Olugbenga O. ; Oyedele, Lukumon O. ; Munir, Kamran ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Ajayi, Saheed O. ; Owolabi, Hakeem A. ; Alaka, Hafiz A. ; Bello, Sururah A. / Evaluation criteria for construction waste management tools. In: International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 3-21.

Bibtex

@article{4bc7830d6f03482da28c07619862a50d,
title = "Evaluation criteria for construction waste management tools",
abstract = "This study identifies evaluation criteria with the goal of appraising the performance of existing construction waste management tools and employing the results in the development of a holistic building information modelling (BIM) framework for construction waste management. Based on the literature, this paper identifies 32 construction waste management tools in five categories: (a) waste management plan templates and guides, (b) waste data collection and audit tools (c) waste quantification models, (d) waste prediction tools, and (e) geographic information system (GIS)-enabled waste tools. After reviewing these tools and conducting four focus-group interviews (FGIs), the findings revealed six categories of evaluation criteria (a) waste prediction; (b) waste data; (c) commercial and procurement; (d) BIM; (e) design; and (f) technological. The performance of the tools is assessed using the evaluation criteria and the result reveals that the existing tools are not robust enough to tackle construction waste management at the design stage. The paper therefore discusses the development of a holistic BIM framework with six layers: application; service domain; BIM business domain; presentation; data; and infrastructure. The BIM framework provides a holistic approach and organizes relevant knowledge required to tackle construction waste effectively at the design stage using an architecture-based layered approach. This framework will be of interest to software developers and BIM practitioners who seek to extend the functionalities of existing BIM software for construction waste management.",
keywords = "building information modelling, Construction waste management tools, evaluation criteria, framework, thematic analysis, waste data, waste prediction",
author = "Akinade, {Olugbenga O.} and Oyedele, {Lukumon O.} and Kamran Munir and Muhammad Bilal and Ajayi, {Saheed O.} and Owolabi, {Hakeem A.} and Alaka, {Hafiz A.} and Bello, {Sururah A.}",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/2093761X.2016.1152203",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "3--21",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development",
issn = "2093-761X",
publisher = "Sustainable Building Research Center",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation criteria for construction waste management tools

AU - Akinade, Olugbenga O.

AU - Oyedele, Lukumon O.

AU - Munir, Kamran

AU - Bilal, Muhammad

AU - Ajayi, Saheed O.

AU - Owolabi, Hakeem A.

AU - Alaka, Hafiz A.

AU - Bello, Sururah A.

PY - 2016/3/23

Y1 - 2016/3/23

N2 - This study identifies evaluation criteria with the goal of appraising the performance of existing construction waste management tools and employing the results in the development of a holistic building information modelling (BIM) framework for construction waste management. Based on the literature, this paper identifies 32 construction waste management tools in five categories: (a) waste management plan templates and guides, (b) waste data collection and audit tools (c) waste quantification models, (d) waste prediction tools, and (e) geographic information system (GIS)-enabled waste tools. After reviewing these tools and conducting four focus-group interviews (FGIs), the findings revealed six categories of evaluation criteria (a) waste prediction; (b) waste data; (c) commercial and procurement; (d) BIM; (e) design; and (f) technological. The performance of the tools is assessed using the evaluation criteria and the result reveals that the existing tools are not robust enough to tackle construction waste management at the design stage. The paper therefore discusses the development of a holistic BIM framework with six layers: application; service domain; BIM business domain; presentation; data; and infrastructure. The BIM framework provides a holistic approach and organizes relevant knowledge required to tackle construction waste effectively at the design stage using an architecture-based layered approach. This framework will be of interest to software developers and BIM practitioners who seek to extend the functionalities of existing BIM software for construction waste management.

AB - This study identifies evaluation criteria with the goal of appraising the performance of existing construction waste management tools and employing the results in the development of a holistic building information modelling (BIM) framework for construction waste management. Based on the literature, this paper identifies 32 construction waste management tools in five categories: (a) waste management plan templates and guides, (b) waste data collection and audit tools (c) waste quantification models, (d) waste prediction tools, and (e) geographic information system (GIS)-enabled waste tools. After reviewing these tools and conducting four focus-group interviews (FGIs), the findings revealed six categories of evaluation criteria (a) waste prediction; (b) waste data; (c) commercial and procurement; (d) BIM; (e) design; and (f) technological. The performance of the tools is assessed using the evaluation criteria and the result reveals that the existing tools are not robust enough to tackle construction waste management at the design stage. The paper therefore discusses the development of a holistic BIM framework with six layers: application; service domain; BIM business domain; presentation; data; and infrastructure. The BIM framework provides a holistic approach and organizes relevant knowledge required to tackle construction waste effectively at the design stage using an architecture-based layered approach. This framework will be of interest to software developers and BIM practitioners who seek to extend the functionalities of existing BIM software for construction waste management.

KW - building information modelling

KW - Construction waste management tools

KW - evaluation criteria

KW - framework

KW - thematic analysis

KW - waste data

KW - waste prediction

U2 - 10.1080/2093761X.2016.1152203

DO - 10.1080/2093761X.2016.1152203

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 3

EP - 21

JO - International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development

JF - International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development

SN - 2093-761X

IS - 1

ER -