University of Hertfordshire

By the same authors

Hegel on Purpose

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

Standard

Hegel on Purpose. / Sandis, Constantine; Laitinen, Arto.

In: Hegel Bulletin, 29.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Sandis, Constantine ; Laitinen, Arto. / Hegel on Purpose. In: Hegel Bulletin. 2019.

Bibtex

@article{18fcf4e7c40a4a98ab640a9a45a8bb9f,
title = "Hegel on Purpose",
abstract = "In this paper we propose a new interpretation of Hegel{\textquoteright}s views on action and responsibility, defending it against its most plausible exegetical competitors. Any exposition of Hegel will face both terminological and substantive challenges, and so we place, from the outset, some interpretational constraints. The paper divides into two parts. In Part I, we point out that Hegel makes a number of distinctions which any sensible account of responsibility should indeed make. Our aim here is to show that Hegel at least has the materials for a sensible and nuanced account, whatever the precise details of how they hang together. Part II then turns to a hard question concerning the relation of two different aspects of our deeds to responsibility. We consider five alternate ways of relieving the tension in Hegel{\textquoteright}s text, before putting forth our own, preferred, solution. S",
author = "Constantine Sandis and Arto Laitinen",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1017/hgl.2019.12",
language = "English",
journal = "Hegel Bulletin",
issn = "2051-5367",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hegel on Purpose

AU - Sandis, Constantine

AU - Laitinen, Arto

N1 - © 2019 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2019/8/29

Y1 - 2019/8/29

N2 - In this paper we propose a new interpretation of Hegel’s views on action and responsibility, defending it against its most plausible exegetical competitors. Any exposition of Hegel will face both terminological and substantive challenges, and so we place, from the outset, some interpretational constraints. The paper divides into two parts. In Part I, we point out that Hegel makes a number of distinctions which any sensible account of responsibility should indeed make. Our aim here is to show that Hegel at least has the materials for a sensible and nuanced account, whatever the precise details of how they hang together. Part II then turns to a hard question concerning the relation of two different aspects of our deeds to responsibility. We consider five alternate ways of relieving the tension in Hegel’s text, before putting forth our own, preferred, solution. S

AB - In this paper we propose a new interpretation of Hegel’s views on action and responsibility, defending it against its most plausible exegetical competitors. Any exposition of Hegel will face both terminological and substantive challenges, and so we place, from the outset, some interpretational constraints. The paper divides into two parts. In Part I, we point out that Hegel makes a number of distinctions which any sensible account of responsibility should indeed make. Our aim here is to show that Hegel at least has the materials for a sensible and nuanced account, whatever the precise details of how they hang together. Part II then turns to a hard question concerning the relation of two different aspects of our deeds to responsibility. We consider five alternate ways of relieving the tension in Hegel’s text, before putting forth our own, preferred, solution. S

U2 - 10.1017/hgl.2019.12

DO - 10.1017/hgl.2019.12

M3 - Special issue

JO - Hegel Bulletin

JF - Hegel Bulletin

SN - 2051-5367

ER -