University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

How Quality Improvement Collaboratives Work to Improve Healthcare in Care Homes: A Realist Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Documents

  • Reena Devi
  • Neil H Chadborn
  • Julienne Meyer
  • Jay Banerjee
  • Claire Goodman
  • Tom Dening
  • John Gladman
  • Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith
  • Annabelle Long
  • Adeela Usman
  • Gemma Housley
  • Sarah Lewis
  • Matthew Glover
  • Heather Gage
  • Philippa A Logan
  • Finbarr Martin
  • Adam L Gordon
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Article numberafab007
Number of pages11
JournalAge and Ageing
Early online date16 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Feb 2021

Abstract

Background
Quality Improvement Collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood.
Methods
A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement.
Results
QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they: have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes; and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload.
Conclusions
These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI.

Notes

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

ID: 24310757