University of Hertfordshire

Standard

More than A to B : The role of free bus travel for the mobility and wellbeing of older citizens in London. / Green, Judith; Jones, Alasdair John Howard; Roberts, Helen.

In: Ageing and Society, Vol. 34, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 472-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Green, Judith ; Jones, Alasdair John Howard ; Roberts, Helen. / More than A to B : The role of free bus travel for the mobility and wellbeing of older citizens in London. In: Ageing and Society. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 472-494.

Bibtex

@article{f2827687a8854bf3b867f26987c77673,
title = "More than A to B: The role of free bus travel for the mobility and wellbeing of older citizens in London",
abstract = "This study contributes to the literature on mobility and wellbeing at older ages. Taking London as a case study, where older citizens have free access to a relatively extensive and accessible public transport network, particularly the bus service, we explore the various mechanisms that link this entitlement (the {\textquoteleft}Freedom Pass{\textquoteright}) to determinants of wellbeing. Apart from the ways in which free bus travel enabled access to those goods and services that are essential to health, the Freedom Pass provided a number of less tangible, but equally significant benefits. Travelling by bus provided myriad opportunities for meaningful social interaction. Travelling as part of the {\textquoteleft}general public{\textquoteright} provided both a sense of belonging and visibility in the public arena, providing a socially acceptable way of tackling chronic loneliness. The Freedom Pass was described as both a {\textquoteleft}lifeline{\textquoteright}, providing access to essential goods and services for wellbeing, but also, for many, a {\textquoteleft}lifestyle{\textquoteright}, a widely prized mechanism for enabling a good quality of life in the city. In the context of good public transport provision, driving cessation had fewer negative connotations for older people{\textquoteright}s mobility than reported in other studies. We argue that the mechanisms linking mobility and wellbeing are culturally, materially and politically specific: in contexts where good, accessible public transport is available as a right, and bus travel is not stigmatised, it is understood as a major contributor to wellbeing, rather than a transport choice of last resort.",
keywords = "Bus travel, Loneliness, Mobility, Wellbeing",
author = "Judith Green and Jones, {Alasdair John Howard} and Helen Roberts",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} Cambridge University Press 2012 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1017/S0144686X12001110",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "472--494",
journal = "Ageing and Society",
issn = "0144-686X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - More than A to B

T2 - The role of free bus travel for the mobility and wellbeing of older citizens in London

AU - Green, Judith

AU - Jones, Alasdair John Howard

AU - Roberts, Helen

N1 - Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - This study contributes to the literature on mobility and wellbeing at older ages. Taking London as a case study, where older citizens have free access to a relatively extensive and accessible public transport network, particularly the bus service, we explore the various mechanisms that link this entitlement (the ‘Freedom Pass’) to determinants of wellbeing. Apart from the ways in which free bus travel enabled access to those goods and services that are essential to health, the Freedom Pass provided a number of less tangible, but equally significant benefits. Travelling by bus provided myriad opportunities for meaningful social interaction. Travelling as part of the ‘general public’ provided both a sense of belonging and visibility in the public arena, providing a socially acceptable way of tackling chronic loneliness. The Freedom Pass was described as both a ‘lifeline’, providing access to essential goods and services for wellbeing, but also, for many, a ‘lifestyle’, a widely prized mechanism for enabling a good quality of life in the city. In the context of good public transport provision, driving cessation had fewer negative connotations for older people’s mobility than reported in other studies. We argue that the mechanisms linking mobility and wellbeing are culturally, materially and politically specific: in contexts where good, accessible public transport is available as a right, and bus travel is not stigmatised, it is understood as a major contributor to wellbeing, rather than a transport choice of last resort.

AB - This study contributes to the literature on mobility and wellbeing at older ages. Taking London as a case study, where older citizens have free access to a relatively extensive and accessible public transport network, particularly the bus service, we explore the various mechanisms that link this entitlement (the ‘Freedom Pass’) to determinants of wellbeing. Apart from the ways in which free bus travel enabled access to those goods and services that are essential to health, the Freedom Pass provided a number of less tangible, but equally significant benefits. Travelling by bus provided myriad opportunities for meaningful social interaction. Travelling as part of the ‘general public’ provided both a sense of belonging and visibility in the public arena, providing a socially acceptable way of tackling chronic loneliness. The Freedom Pass was described as both a ‘lifeline’, providing access to essential goods and services for wellbeing, but also, for many, a ‘lifestyle’, a widely prized mechanism for enabling a good quality of life in the city. In the context of good public transport provision, driving cessation had fewer negative connotations for older people’s mobility than reported in other studies. We argue that the mechanisms linking mobility and wellbeing are culturally, materially and politically specific: in contexts where good, accessible public transport is available as a right, and bus travel is not stigmatised, it is understood as a major contributor to wellbeing, rather than a transport choice of last resort.

KW - Bus travel

KW - Loneliness

KW - Mobility

KW - Wellbeing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870062500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0144686X12001110

DO - 10.1017/S0144686X12001110

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 472

EP - 494

JO - Ageing and Society

JF - Ageing and Society

SN - 0144-686X

IS - 3

ER -