University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Nonadherence in dialysis patients: prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article

Standard

Nonadherence in dialysis patients : prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants. / Clark, Sarah; Farrington, Ken; Chilcot, Joseph.

In: Seminars in Dialysis, Vol. 27, No. 1, 30.10.2013, p. 42-9.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article

Harvard

Clark, S, Farrington, K & Chilcot, J 2013, 'Nonadherence in dialysis patients: prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants', Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 42-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12159

APA

Clark, S., Farrington, K., & Chilcot, J. (2013). Nonadherence in dialysis patients: prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants. Seminars in Dialysis, 27(1), 42-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12159

Vancouver

Clark S, Farrington K, Chilcot J. Nonadherence in dialysis patients: prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants. Seminars in Dialysis. 2013 Oct 30;27(1):42-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12159

Author

Clark, Sarah ; Farrington, Ken ; Chilcot, Joseph. / Nonadherence in dialysis patients : prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants. In: Seminars in Dialysis. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 42-9.

Bibtex

@article{777e7a4c7fd74c7aba478b8fc76522bf,
title = "Nonadherence in dialysis patients: prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants",
abstract = "Nonadherence to aspects of the management of End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) is common. Estimates of nonadherence vary with assessment method. Whilst readily available and free from report bias, physiological proxies-frequently used as measures of adherence-are often confounded by clinical factors including residual kidney function and dialysis adequacy. Despite variation in estimates of its prevalence, it is clear that suboptimal adherence to dialysis prescriptions, medication and diet can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Several factors can help explain nonadherence in ESKD including mood, self-efficacy, social support, illness, and treatment perceptions. Psychological interventions have been shown to improve ESKD adherence, yet achieving long-term behavior change remains challenging. Identifying individuals who struggle to adhere to aspects of the dialysis regime, and tailoring theory-led interventions to improve and support adherence is a clear clinical need requiring further empirical enquiry.",
keywords = "Attitude to Health, Biomarkers, Depression, Health Behavior, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Patient Compliance, Prevalence, Renal Dialysis, Self Efficacy, Self Report, Social Support, Surveys and Questionnaires, Journal Article, Review",
author = "Sarah Clark and Ken Farrington and Joseph Chilcot",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/sdi.12159",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "42--9",
journal = "Seminars in Dialysis",
issn = "0894-0959",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonadherence in dialysis patients

T2 - prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants

AU - Clark, Sarah

AU - Farrington, Ken

AU - Chilcot, Joseph

N1 - © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2013/10/30

Y1 - 2013/10/30

N2 - Nonadherence to aspects of the management of End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) is common. Estimates of nonadherence vary with assessment method. Whilst readily available and free from report bias, physiological proxies-frequently used as measures of adherence-are often confounded by clinical factors including residual kidney function and dialysis adequacy. Despite variation in estimates of its prevalence, it is clear that suboptimal adherence to dialysis prescriptions, medication and diet can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Several factors can help explain nonadherence in ESKD including mood, self-efficacy, social support, illness, and treatment perceptions. Psychological interventions have been shown to improve ESKD adherence, yet achieving long-term behavior change remains challenging. Identifying individuals who struggle to adhere to aspects of the dialysis regime, and tailoring theory-led interventions to improve and support adherence is a clear clinical need requiring further empirical enquiry.

AB - Nonadherence to aspects of the management of End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) is common. Estimates of nonadherence vary with assessment method. Whilst readily available and free from report bias, physiological proxies-frequently used as measures of adherence-are often confounded by clinical factors including residual kidney function and dialysis adequacy. Despite variation in estimates of its prevalence, it is clear that suboptimal adherence to dialysis prescriptions, medication and diet can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Several factors can help explain nonadherence in ESKD including mood, self-efficacy, social support, illness, and treatment perceptions. Psychological interventions have been shown to improve ESKD adherence, yet achieving long-term behavior change remains challenging. Identifying individuals who struggle to adhere to aspects of the dialysis regime, and tailoring theory-led interventions to improve and support adherence is a clear clinical need requiring further empirical enquiry.

KW - Attitude to Health

KW - Biomarkers

KW - Depression

KW - Health Behavior

KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

KW - Humans

KW - Kidney Failure, Chronic

KW - Patient Compliance

KW - Prevalence

KW - Renal Dialysis

KW - Self Efficacy

KW - Self Report

KW - Social Support

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1111/sdi.12159

DO - 10.1111/sdi.12159

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24164416

VL - 27

SP - 42

EP - 49

JO - Seminars in Dialysis

JF - Seminars in Dialysis

SN - 0894-0959

IS - 1

ER -