University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

Russellian Physicalism and Protophenomenal Properties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Article numberanaa006
JournalAnalysis
Early online date18 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 May 2020

Abstract

We consider an argument from Morris and Brown that there cannot be a genuinely physicalist version of Russellian monism, and rebut that argument. The rebuttal involves making a distinction between ways protophenomenal properties can be individuated: i). in terms of roles they play (e.g. grounding physical dispositions, constituting consciousness) and ii). in terms of their intrinsic nature. The Morris-Brown objection depends on individuating protophenomenal properties in way i), and can be sidestepped by individuating them in way ii, which, we argue, is anyway more in line with existing formulations of Russellian physicalism in the literature.

Notes

© 2020 Oxford University Press. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Analysis following peer review. The version of record [Torin Alter, Sam Coleman, Russellian physicalism and protophenomenal properties, Analysis, anaa006, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaa006] is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaa006.

ID: 19322899