University of Hertfordshire

Standard

Should Participants be Left to their Own Devices? Comparing Paper and Smartphone Diaries in Psychological Research. / Laughland, Andrew; Kvavilashvili, Lia.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 552-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{e36b7301fb1548ec919f1d5bfb35ad7a,
title = "Should Participants be Left to their Own Devices? Comparing Paper and Smartphone Diaries in Psychological Research",
abstract = "Growing smartphone ownership creates unprecedented opportunities for using participants{\textquoteright} own smartphones as diaries to record transient phenomena in daily life. In three studies, we assessed the hypothesis that participant-owned smartphone diaries would result in superior compliance and higher number of recorded entries than the traditional paper-diary method. Paper and smartphone diaries were compared for self-initiated recording of involuntary autobiographical memories (Studies 1 and 2) and everyday memory failures (Study 3). Diary-recording period (7-day, 1-day) was also examined by comparing results of Studies 1 and 2. Smartphone owners were highly compliant, carrying diaries and making entries sooner. Nevertheless, significantly fewer memory events were recorded in smartphones than paper diaries in all studies. Moreover, the number of memories recorded in Study 2 (1-day) was significantly higher than recorded on day 1 of Study 1 (7-day), suggesting that shorter diary-keeping periods may be preferable. Implications and opportunities for improving smartphone-diary functionality are discussed.",
keywords = "Electronic diary, Everyday memory failure, Involuntary autobiographical memory, Paper diary, Smartphone",
author = "Andrew Laughland and Lia Kvavilashvili",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "552--563",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition",
issn = "2211-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should Participants be Left to their Own Devices? Comparing Paper and Smartphone Diaries in Psychological Research

AU - Laughland, Andrew

AU - Kvavilashvili, Lia

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Growing smartphone ownership creates unprecedented opportunities for using participants’ own smartphones as diaries to record transient phenomena in daily life. In three studies, we assessed the hypothesis that participant-owned smartphone diaries would result in superior compliance and higher number of recorded entries than the traditional paper-diary method. Paper and smartphone diaries were compared for self-initiated recording of involuntary autobiographical memories (Studies 1 and 2) and everyday memory failures (Study 3). Diary-recording period (7-day, 1-day) was also examined by comparing results of Studies 1 and 2. Smartphone owners were highly compliant, carrying diaries and making entries sooner. Nevertheless, significantly fewer memory events were recorded in smartphones than paper diaries in all studies. Moreover, the number of memories recorded in Study 2 (1-day) was significantly higher than recorded on day 1 of Study 1 (7-day), suggesting that shorter diary-keeping periods may be preferable. Implications and opportunities for improving smartphone-diary functionality are discussed.

AB - Growing smartphone ownership creates unprecedented opportunities for using participants’ own smartphones as diaries to record transient phenomena in daily life. In three studies, we assessed the hypothesis that participant-owned smartphone diaries would result in superior compliance and higher number of recorded entries than the traditional paper-diary method. Paper and smartphone diaries were compared for self-initiated recording of involuntary autobiographical memories (Studies 1 and 2) and everyday memory failures (Study 3). Diary-recording period (7-day, 1-day) was also examined by comparing results of Studies 1 and 2. Smartphone owners were highly compliant, carrying diaries and making entries sooner. Nevertheless, significantly fewer memory events were recorded in smartphones than paper diaries in all studies. Moreover, the number of memories recorded in Study 2 (1-day) was significantly higher than recorded on day 1 of Study 1 (7-day), suggesting that shorter diary-keeping periods may be preferable. Implications and opportunities for improving smartphone-diary functionality are discussed.

KW - Electronic diary

KW - Everyday memory failure

KW - Involuntary autobiographical memory

KW - Paper diary

KW - Smartphone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054517527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054517527

VL - 7

SP - 552

EP - 563

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

SN - 2211-3681

IS - 4

ER -