University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

The Corporate Baby in the Bathwater: Why Proposals to Abolish Corporate Personhood Are Misguided

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages44
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Early online date23 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jan 2022

Abstract

The fear that business corporations have claimed unwarranted constitutional protections which have entrenched corporate power has produced a broad social movement demanding that constitutional rights be restricted to human beings and corporate personhood be abolished. We develop a critique of these proposals organized around the three salient rationales we identify in the accompanying narrative, which we argue reflect a narrow focus on large business corporations, a misunderstanding of the legal concept of personhood, and a failure to distinguish different kinds of constitutional rights and the reasons for assigning them. Corporate personhood and corporate constitutional rights are not problematic per se once these notions are decoupled from biological, metaphysical or moral considerations. The real challenge is that we need a principled way of thinking about the priority of human over corporate persons which does not reduce the efficacy of corporate institutions or harm liberal democracies.

Notes

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05019-4

ID: 26455963