Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
View graph of relations
Original language | English |
---|
Pages (from-to) | 141-160 |
---|
Number of pages | 20 |
---|
Journal | Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding |
---|
Volume | 15 |
---|
Issue | 2 |
---|
Early online date | 1 Mar 2021 |
---|
DOIs | |
---|
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1 Mar 2021 |
---|
Abstract
Recent critical perspectives on peacebuilding have sought to shed light on experiences so far marginalized by mainstream approaches. In particular, critics have pushed peacebuilding towards radically different ways of thinking about governance, conflict and peace, by engaging with narratives, experiences and knowledge coming from societies perceived as not invested in modernity or liberalism, such as Indigenous communities. Whilst this may force theory to confront questions of human-centrism, colonial erasure, and structural violence, turning to Indigeneity without questioning the impact of liberal peace ‘thinking', might further elicit marginalization and appropriation, and simply ‘save’ liberal peacebuilding through the back door.
Notes
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2021.1882755
ID: 24902642