University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

  • Indranil Dasgupta
  • Ken Farrington
  • Simon J Davies
  • Andrew Davenport
  • Sandip Mitra
View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-31
Number of pages8
JournalBlood Purification
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016


BACKGROUND: Fluid management in haemodialysis (HD) affects patient experience, morbidity and mortality. Standards for best practice are lacking. A national survey of the United Kingdom was undertaken to define prevalent practice.

METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to all UK renal centres.

RESULTS: Forty-five of 74 centres (173 dialysis units), serving 62% (n = 14,697) of UK HD population responded. Seventy-eight per cent had no agreed policy for managing fluid balance in patients on HD; 44% did not assess fluid status routinely. Clinical assessment was the norm; 27% used bio-impedance-based device. To achieve a target-weight, 53% reduced weight as far as tolerated. Twenty-two per cent measured residual renal function (RRF). Ninety-one per cent had no policy for fluid overload. Sixty-four per cent restricted salt and water. Ninety-three per cent used diuretics in patients with RRF. Thirty-eight per cent felt management was adequate; 77% felt there was a need for better evidence. Ninety-one per cent would participate in a study addressing this.

CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need for establishing an evidence base on the optimal approaches to fluid management.

ID: 13324281