University of Hertfordshire

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{0bb73114aa2d40ce926242dcd2c658f2,
title = "We were in one place, and the ethics committee in another: Experiences of the research ethics application process",
abstract = "This study aimed to explore postgraduate students{\textquoteright} lived experiences of managing research ethics committee processes. Whilst there is a wide range of research that explores ethics principles/guidance and committee perspectives upon research ethics processes, there is a lack of research into applicant experiences of these processes. Thus, interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was utilised to explore the lived experiences and personal meaning-making of seven Doctoral level students participating in clinical psychology training. Three main themes emerged from participants{\textquoteright} accounts: (1) The emotional intensity and personal impact of the ethics process; (2) Responses to and ways of managing the ethics process; and (3) Challenges within the ethics process. The results of this study highlight the importance of recognising the impact of the relationships between research students, courses and research ethics committees upon applicants{\textquoteright} progress through the research ethics process. In particular, an unhelpful {\textquoteleft}them and us{\textquoteright} dynamic may be maintained by misunderstandings about each other{\textquoteright}s roles, uncertainty and stereotyping, amongst other factors. Potential ways to change this dynamic and to improve the research ethics process are explored.",
keywords = "research ethics, post-graduate research, clinical psychology",
author = "Robert Brindley and Lizette Nolte and Nel, {Pieter W}",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "10",
language = "English",
journal = "Clinical Ethics",
issn = "1758-101X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - We were in one place, and the ethics committee in another: Experiences of the research ethics application process

AU - Brindley, Robert

AU - Nolte, Lizette

AU - Nel, Pieter W

PY - 2020/2/10

Y1 - 2020/2/10

N2 - This study aimed to explore postgraduate students’ lived experiences of managing research ethics committee processes. Whilst there is a wide range of research that explores ethics principles/guidance and committee perspectives upon research ethics processes, there is a lack of research into applicant experiences of these processes. Thus, interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was utilised to explore the lived experiences and personal meaning-making of seven Doctoral level students participating in clinical psychology training. Three main themes emerged from participants’ accounts: (1) The emotional intensity and personal impact of the ethics process; (2) Responses to and ways of managing the ethics process; and (3) Challenges within the ethics process. The results of this study highlight the importance of recognising the impact of the relationships between research students, courses and research ethics committees upon applicants’ progress through the research ethics process. In particular, an unhelpful ‘them and us’ dynamic may be maintained by misunderstandings about each other’s roles, uncertainty and stereotyping, amongst other factors. Potential ways to change this dynamic and to improve the research ethics process are explored.

AB - This study aimed to explore postgraduate students’ lived experiences of managing research ethics committee processes. Whilst there is a wide range of research that explores ethics principles/guidance and committee perspectives upon research ethics processes, there is a lack of research into applicant experiences of these processes. Thus, interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was utilised to explore the lived experiences and personal meaning-making of seven Doctoral level students participating in clinical psychology training. Three main themes emerged from participants’ accounts: (1) The emotional intensity and personal impact of the ethics process; (2) Responses to and ways of managing the ethics process; and (3) Challenges within the ethics process. The results of this study highlight the importance of recognising the impact of the relationships between research students, courses and research ethics committees upon applicants’ progress through the research ethics process. In particular, an unhelpful ‘them and us’ dynamic may be maintained by misunderstandings about each other’s roles, uncertainty and stereotyping, amongst other factors. Potential ways to change this dynamic and to improve the research ethics process are explored.

KW - research ethics, post-graduate research, clinical psychology

M3 - Article

JO - Clinical Ethics

JF - Clinical Ethics

SN - 1758-101X

ER -