University of Hertfordshire

From the same journal

By the same authors

What Neither Abraham nor Johannes de Silentio Could Say

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Documents

View graph of relations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-99
Number of pages21
JournalAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume
Volume82
Issue1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Abstract

Though there are significant points of overlap between Michelle Kosch’s reading of Fear and Trembling and my own, this paper focuses primarily on a significant difference: the legitimacy or otherwise of looking to paradigmatic exemplars of faith in order to understand faith. I argue that Kosch’s reading threatens to underplay the importance of exemplarity in Kierkegaard’s thought, and that there is good reason to resist her use of Philosophical Fragments as the key to interpreting the ‘hidden message’ of Fear and Trembling. Key to both claims is the Concluding Unscientific Postscript. I also briefly sketch an alternative reading of the ‘hidden message’, one in which Kierkegaard’s Christian commitments play a notably different role.

Notes

("The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com") Copyright Aristotelian Society. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2008.00163.x

ID: 188422